Education
An Article by Robert Love,
Head of the Education Department, Langley Wellington
The World of Special Educational Needs
(SEN) and the Education Act 1996
Does your child have SEN or do you think he
may have SEN?
How many times are parents told that:-
- There are many children with more severe
needs than your child's.
- You are only being a pushy parent
- The LEA does not have any money anyway.
I think anyone becoming involved in the
field of SEN and Education Law has to
be driven by personal circumstances. In my case my son Jonathan was
born 26
years ago with severe brain damage. He is still unable to speak and has
a
developmental age of 2/3 but he gets a lot of fun and pleasure out of
life in
his current adult placement. After a number of discussions with our
Local
Education Authority (LEA) and an appeal we
were eventually
successful in securing Jonathan's placement at a residential special
school.
This was at the time when the Education Act 1981 was
in force.
I know how draining and traumatic parents' battles are with LEAs. You
just feel
that no-one is listening to you.
Subsequently the Education Act 1993 created
for the first time a whole
package of measures designed specifically for children with special
educational
needs. This Act also created the Special Educational Needs Tribunal (SENT)
- as
it was then known, which came into existence on 1st September 1994.
A child has special educational needs if he
or she has a learning difficulty,
which calls for special educational provision to be made. A child is
considered
to have a 'learning difficulty' where:
• The child has a
significantly greater difficulty in learning than
the majority of children of his age.
• The child has a
disability, which either prevents or hinders him
from making use of educational facilities of a kind generally provided
for
children of his age in schools within the area of the Local Education
Authority.
• The child is under the
age of five years and is, or would be, if
special educational provision were not made for him, likely to fall
within
paragraph (a) or (b) when over that age.
"Special Educational Provision" means:
• In relation to a child
who has attained two years, educational
provision which is additional to or otherwise different from the
educational
provision made generally for children of his age in schools maintained
by the
LEA (other than special schools) or grant maintained schools in their
area and
• In relation to a child
under that age educational provision of any
kind.
Parents or a responsible body (a school for
example) can request an LEA to
carry out an assessment of a child's SEN. The LEA can initiate an
assessment of
its own volition. If the LEA refuses to carry out a Statutory
Assessment
following a request having been made by a parent or a responsible body
the
parent may appeal to SENDIST.
Parents will need to obtain their own expert
reports and submit these to the
LEA and SENDIST. If a Statutory Assessment is carried out, whether by
order of
the Tribunal or the LEA agreeing to it then the LEA has to obtain
certain
advice, e.g. educational, psychological and medical advice as well as
advice
from other agencies such as Social Services. Parents have a right to be
present
at any assessments which are carried out in respect of their child.
Further rights of appeal exist to SENDIST
against an LEA's refusal to make a Statement
of Special Educational Needs for a child following the
carrying out of
a Statutory Assessment or against the contents of a Statement of
Special
Educational Needs.
There are statutory time limits for the
carrying out of the Statutory
Assessment and a time in which the LEA have to respond
to any parental
request. If the LEA decide to make a Statement of Special Educational
Needs,
Part 2 oheatherlove10@hotmail.com
f the Statement has been likened to a medical diagnosis of the
child's
educational needs and Part 3, a prescription to meet the child's
educational
needs (see R v Secretary of State for Education and Science ex parte E
[1992] 1
FLR 377, CA).
The provision proposed by the LEA must
normally be quantified e.g. in terms
of hours of provision and staffing arrangements etc - see paragraph
8.37 of the
Code of Practice and also L v Clarke and Somerset County Council [1998]
ELR 1998
(QBD). Many LEAs will not specify any levels of provision at all in
their
Statements seeking to maintain the right of flexibility. However, when
it comes
to enforcing the terms of a "flexible" Statement of Special
Educational Needs, difficulties are normally experienced. The aim from
a
parental point of view must therefore be to get a Statement as
specifically
worded as possible. The aim from the LEA's point of view is not to be
tied down
to any specific levels of provision. Many LEAs like to provide funding
via a banding
system . This allocates a sum of money to the school to
spend on the
child. It is far better to have a specifically worded Statement
providing for
any sum of money to be converted into specific teaching and
non-teaching hours
and therapeutic input etc.
|
We attach a copy of a
letter we have received from the LA here which we understand has been sent to
the Tribunal. In the light of this the appeal is now regarded as being
successful and the hearing scheduled for 9tyh February will be cancelled.
Please formally confirm the position.
Back to Top |
Parents have the right of appeal to SENDIST:
The Special Educational Needs
and Disability Act 2001 came
into force on 2nd January 2002 and amended the Education Act 1996 by:
- strengthening the right of children with
special educational needs to be
educated in mainstream schools;
- requiring Local Education Authorities to
arrange for parents of children
with special educational needs to be provided with advice and
information of
special educational needs matters and means of resolving disputes with
school
and LEAs through mediation.
- obliging schools to tell parents where
they are making special educational
provision for their child and allowing schools to request a statutory
assessment
of a pupil's special educational needs.
- extending the remit of SENDIST to include
disability discrimination claims.
SENDIST appeals can determine issues such
as:
- The delivery of set amounts of speech
and language therapy
- The delivery of occupational
therapy (which many LEAs still
see as a non-educational provision)
- Specific levels of specialist teaching
and in-class support.
- The appropriate school to
be named in the Statement. Both independent
schools and non-maintained schools can
be named in a
child's Statement of Special Educational Needs with the LEA thereby
having to
accept responsibility for funding the cost of the child's placement at
that
school.
Are there any other avenues open to parents?
Yes there are. Parents can appeal to the High
Court on a
point of law against a decision of SENDIST; it is also possible to
provide for Judicial
Review of an LEA's failure, for example, to comply with
the relevant
statutory time limits for completion of a Statutory Assessment or for
failure to
deliver speech therapy, occupational therapy or any other aspect of the
child's
Statement of Special Educational Needs.
|